Skip to content

Treynor Ratio

Excess return per unit of systematic (market) risk. Numerator is the same as Sharpe; denominator is beta instead of total volatility.

When to use: Use when comparing well-diversified portfolios (where idiosyncratic risk has been mostly diversified away, leaving only systematic risk). Sharpe is more appropriate for concentrated portfolios; Treynor for diversified ones.

Calculator

Formula

Treynor=RpRfβp\text{Treynor} = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\beta_p}

Variables

SymbolNameDescriptionUnit
TreynorTreynor RatioExcess return per unit of systematic risk (beta)integer
RpPortfolio ReturnPeriodic mean return of the portfolio as a decimal%
RfRisk-Free RatePer-period risk-free rate as a decimal (use the same period as the returns)%
BetaBetaPortfolio beta against the relevant marketinteger

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Diversified Equity Fund

Portfolio earns 12% annual return, beta 1.2, risk-free rate 3%.

Given

Rp = 0.12Rf = 0.03Beta = 1.20

Step-by-Step

1.Excess return = 0.12 − 0.03 = 0.09
2.Treynor = 0.09 / 1.2 = 0.075
Result:0.08

Treynor of 0.075 means the fund earned 7.5 percentage points of excess return per unit of beta — comparable to a fund earning 7.5% on a beta-1 portfolio.

Example 2: Low-Beta Defensive Fund

Returns 8%, beta 0.6, risk-free rate 3%.

Given

Rp = 0.08Rf = 0.03Beta = 0.6

Step-by-Step

1.Excess return = 0.08 − 0.03 = 0.05
2.Treynor = 0.05 / 0.6 ≈ 0.083
Result:0.08

Treynor of 0.083 — slightly higher than the previous example despite lower absolute return. The defensive fund extracts more excess return per unit of market risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

When the portfolio is well-diversified — most large equity mutual funds, broad index ETFs, or any portfolio where idiosyncratic risk has been diversified to near zero. For undiversified portfolios (single-stock concentrated, narrow sector, etc.) Sharpe is better because it captures total risk, not just market risk.

Negative beta means the portfolio moves opposite the market — rare but possible (e.g. inverse ETFs, gold in some regimes). Treynor remains defined but interpretation flips: a positive excess return with negative beta would be highly attractive (insurance-like).

Closely related. Jensen's alpha = Rp − [Rf + β(Rm − Rf)] — the absolute excess return after CAPM-implied baseline. Treynor is the same idea normalized per unit of beta. Both reward beta-efficient strategies.