Skip to content

Profitability Index (PI)

Ratio of the present value of future cash flows to the initial investment. PI > 1 means the project creates value; PI < 1 means it destroys value. Mathematically equivalent to NPV/|initial investment| + 1.

When to use: Use to rank capital-rationed projects of different sizes — PI gives a normalized "bang for the buck" measure that NPV alone doesn't. Especially useful when you have more attractive projects than capital to fund them all.

Calculator

Formula

PI=PV(future cash flows)CF0=1+NPVCF0PI = \frac{PV(\text{future cash flows})}{|CF_0|} = 1 + \frac{NPV}{|CF_0|}

Variables

SymbolNameDescriptionUnit
PIProfitability IndexRatio of PV of future cash flows to the initial investmentinteger
CashFlowsCash FlowsSequence of cash flows starting at period 0 (negative for outflows, positive for inflows)$
kDiscount RateCost of capital or required rate of return as a decimal (e.g. 0.10 for 10%)%

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: 4-Year Project

Invest $1,000, receive $400/year for 4 years at 10% required return.

Given

CashFlows = k = 0.1

Step-by-Step

1.PV of future CFs = 400 × (1 - 1.1⁻⁴)/0.10 = 1,267.95
2.PI = 1,267.95 / 1,000 = 1.27
Result:1.27

PI of 1.27 — every $1 invested generates $1.27 of present value. Accept (and prefer to a competing project with PI=1.10 if capital is limited).

Example 2: Below-Hurdle Project

$5,000 invested, receiving $1,200, $1,500, $1,800, $2,000 at 12% required return.

Given

CashFlows = k = 0.12

Step-by-Step

1.PV of future CFs ≈ $4,819.48
2.PI = 4,819.48 / 5,000 ≈ 0.96
Result:0.96

PI < 1 — every $1 in produces only $0.96 of present value. Reject.

Frequently Asked Questions

When you have capital constraints. NPV ranks by absolute dollar value created — a $50M project with $5M NPV ranks above a $1M project with $4M NPV, but the smaller project is more capital-efficient (PI 5.0 vs 1.1). Under capital rationing, PI tells you which projects to pick first.

PI = 1 + NPV/|CF₀|. They always agree on accept/reject decisions (PI > 1 ↔ NPV > 0), but disagree on rankings when projects have different sizes.

In the canonical form, PI uses just CF₀ as the denominator. For projects with negative cash flows in multiple early years, sum the PV of all negative CFs and use that as the denominator instead — this implementation uses the magnitude of CF₀ only, which is the standard textbook form.